Jane Brody (NY Times) weighs in on Vitamin D

Jane Brody's article on Vitamin D in the NY Times seems to come a bit late to the table, and it does not seem to reflect the NCI's latest take on the literature linking low Vitamin D to cancer. But, she does have a way of summarizing issues, so it's worth reading. Bottom line: what we knew already. Vitamin D is good for you. You should take at least 1000 to 2000 IU, depending on your stage in life. Most important: get tested.

How to compare hospitals on quality measures

Here is a great site, from the Commonwealth Fund, Why Not the Best? that allows you to compare hospital scores on a range of quality measures. I just did it for Georgetown University Hospital, a bit late for my surgery that took place earlier this year, but I was gratified to learn that GU has a high quality rating. (Whew!)

Areas of agreement & disagreement on how to reduce federal deficit

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget just published the results of its on-line budget simulation project, where people could vote on which actions they would prefer to see the Federal government take. I'm amazed at how much agreement there is across parties on some things. Seems that it's likely the Social Security retirement age will be raised to 68, if lawmakers follow the will of the pople.

A succinct summary of the Evidence on Vitamin D and Cancer, from the NCI

This NCI summary of the evidence on the link (or lack of it) between Vitamin D and cancer incidence is an up-to-date for each cancer type. Bottom line: cancer prevention is not the strongest reason for taking Vitamin D, though its role may be clarified in the future.

Why Vitamin D recommendations are so low.

Here's a great article in the Financial Times about the politics of Vitamin D recommendations. With this issue, there are no bad guys, only policy makers and scientists with different mind-sets about what constitutes good evidence.

To tackle the federal deficit EVERYONE must suffer some.

Here's an analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget which lays out how federal employees have fared over the past few years compared with employees in the private sector. In my view, federal employees should share in the pain to avoid an angry backlash from the American taxpayer in the future.
But, so should everyone else. AARP should take a leadership role here, but I'm not holding my breath.

Vitamin D & Cancer- Could it be just sunlight, and not Vitamin D?

New studies funded by NCI have checked out whether people with high circulating levels of Vitamin D have lower rates of certain rare cancers, and have come up with zilch. Vitamin D doesn't seem to be related to incidence of those cancers. For example, non-hodgkins lymphoma: not affected by Vitamin D. But, Non-hodgkins lymphoma IS inversely related to sun exposure. So, the authors of that study (available free-click here) speculate that there may be some other effect of sunlight on immune systems, not acting through Vitamin D, which protects against n-h lymphoma. Could such an effect be making Vitamin D look good across a variety of correlational studies? Maybe... we'll have to stay tuned to the research as it emerges.